Pamphlet based on 'BRE Guidelines' worse than useless
The 'BRE Guidelines' have not taken into account the problems of our members.
The overwhelming majority of Hedgeline members and of hedge victims will derive no benefit from the measurements suggested in the BRE Guidelines, and the problem-hedges will have been legitimised by the Government. To take, for an example, the problem hedges submitted by our SW Area Organiser for testing of the BRE Draft Guidelines in March of last year, less than 30% benefited from the gardens measurements, and less 25% from the windows measurements. These proportions have not changed since the revision of the Guidelines and we feel that our comments regarding the BRE Guidelines in relation to our members' problems have not been listened to.
Why these guidelines, could do hedge-victims much harm and could legitimise problem hedges
Some people will certainly use this pamphlet as an excuse to burden their neighbour with a silly hedge that they would not otherwise have considered inflicting on them.
There is a hidden message in the draft pamphlet, i.e. that disproportionately large hedges are all right in average and small gardens. The hidden message would put hedge victims, except for the sufferers from the exceptionally huge monsters, in a worse position than they are in now.
Depending on the aspect of the hedge, the BRE guidelines consider a hedge of 10.5 feet suitable 30 feet away from a downstairs window in one garden and an 18.25 feet hedge as suitable 30 feet away from a downstairs window in another garden. This is not a reasonable fair or balanced solution, since light is by no means the only problem. It would be a very unusual person who grew an 18 foot hedge in their own 30 foot garden and quite an unusual person who grew one to 10.5 feet in a garden of this size.
It was stated at the first meeting on hedge heights at the DTLR that the light criterion was intended to provide a proxy for all the other nuisances and that if it did not other factors would be considered. The 'Guidelines' clearly do not provide a proxy for any of the other nuisances which are the same at the end of a 30 foot garden whatever the aspect of the hedge. The BRE guidelines are based completely on an arbitarily decided amount of light.
Contents of this page |
Index pages
How Hedgeline knows that some of the suggested measurements for smaller gardens are too large
Contents of this page |
Index pages
The following diagrams are of heights, in metres, suggested in the BRE Revised Guidelines for hedges directly opposite to windows. It illustrates the unrealistic heights of hedges, for small and average gardens, suggested by the BRE Guidelines. It also illustrates that BRE hedges become proportionately larger as the length of the garden decreases.
*These are the lowest heights obtainable for hedges at the ends of gardens opposite to the house on any of the BRE scales of measurement, if the orientation of the hedge relative to the house is NW. N. NE. or E.
The horizontal acess represents the length of the garden from the windows of the house to the opposite boundary, the vertical axis represents the height of the neighbour's hedge.
Contents of this page |
Index pages
Deprivation of Winter sunlight.
The following table illustrates the degree of winter shade which the BRE revised Guidelines allow from a South orientated hedge and this does not even take into account the shadow from higher hedges to East and West.
By mid-February
65 % of garden still in full shade
By end March
50% of garden stll in full shade
At Summer Solstice
20% garden in shade ( permanent shade)
(Figure 7. BRE Guidelines October 2001)
The BRE measurements cut out Winter sunshine to downstairs windows
in total or part from mid - November to mid - February.
A Question of Safety and Hedge Height regarding the proposed heights
It was clearly stated that the single light criterion was to be a proxy for all forms of high-hedge nuisance. Hedgeline would ask whether the problem of maintenance of high hedges could be solved by the suggested heights in the 'BRE Guideines'.
Advice from a Countryside and Arboriculture Officer, which was sent on request. This is the advice he gives out in his professional capacity.
Contents of this page |
Return to 'Comments on Recently Published Guidelines', February 2002 | Index pages
Maximum hedge heights in metres for hedges directly opposite windows (based on light and common sense)
The majority of people choose 2 metres as the height for the boundary screens in small and average gardens, and this leads to the assumption that 2 metres is all that should be imposed on owners of small and average gardens by their neighbours. 2 metres is quite a high boundary screen in an average garden.
Pamphlet Worse than Useless. It Backs Nuisance Hedges. |
The Government are pushing ahead with their pamphlet based on the 'BRE Guidelines'
We are being given something which will help only one third of cases and materially reduce the nuisance for about a tenth.
The DTLR states that it wishes to give us something objective which can be used to negotiate with a grower. How can we use these height scales to negotiate when our hedges are already lower than the allegedly objective measurements given?
The DTLR scales are not objective because the DTLR has itself decided on the quantity of light it is going to allow the victim. It has decided what to give and what to take away. It allows little winter sunlight to gardens, and none to ground floor windows during December and January. The scales of measurement based on light could have been almost anything the DTLR decided to make them. The claim of objectivity is to impress and subdue, and people need to understand this.
The scales give a very little help and will licence the growers of problem hedges. Our plight has not been recognised. Our Government is not going to stand up to the bullies.
To investigate the norm is the only way to provide a fair scale of measurements. The norm is incontestable and verifiable fact. It cannot lie. It is there for all to see and investigate.
Hedge victims want to have the hedge heights that the majority of people choose for themselves in a given size of garden.
|
Return to Contents of this Page
ARCHIVE INDEX - Records Prior to Legislation